Besieged by love? How many times have you read something like “her emotions were under siege” in a romance novel? I feel like this metaphor is common, and compelling, yet I’ve never really unpacked it. For one thing, it suggests a traditionally gendered experience, in which the hero is the pursuer, surrounding the heroine with his army of manly charms until she accepts and gives in to the inevitability of surrender/conquest.
What makes this work in genre romance is that while she may be “conquered” by the hero’s love, the heroine surrenders as much to the power of her own corresponding emotion as to the conquering male. The siege as romantic metaphor sort of circles in on itself, since the besieged is frequently “starving” herself of love/emotion while the besieger “attacks” by providing rather than depriving. (I know there must be examples of the metaphor used with the genders reversed and a pursuing heroine laying siege to her hero…I hope to hear of such in comments since I can’t find one at the moment!)
Until last month, it’d been quite a while since I read a romance, or indeed any novel, where the hero wears chain mail. Then I picked Sharon Kay Penman’s LIONHEART off a very dusty spot on my TBR shelf, for a “challenge” read involving Big Fat Books. Not a romance, but it reminded me how much I used to enjoy and immerse myself in historical fiction with medieval settings, and whetted my appetite. Also, here was a book brimming with literal historical examples of siege warfare, replete with all the implements (heavy weaponry, grappling hooks, scaling ladders) and strategies (starvation, persistence, ruthlessness) from which the literary & emotional metaphors derive.
I confess, I had to push myself a bit to get through this long book about England’s Richard ‘the Lionheart’ and his exploits in the Holy Land during the Second (?) Crusade in 1190-92. Based on my memories of Penman’s Welsh trilogy (it was nearly 20 years ago, but I treasure these books among my ‘best evers’), I had thought there’d be a stronger romantic element, and I found myself really missing the emotional satisfaction of a romance HEA. I also missed the sense that there is an end to the story at all, since this was just one long chunk of a multi-novel Angevin saga, and leaves off just as Richard is returning to England to deal with his treacherous relatives.
So – time for a medieval romance.
Fortunately, hard on the heels of my March reading challenge came SIEGE OF THE HEART, a debut release from Elise Cyr, an author acquaintance from Twitter. I am thoroughly enjoying this romance between a Norman knight and a sword-wielding English heiress, and it’s got me re-examining some of my own assumptions about medieval romance novels, thinking about why I stopped reading them, whether they’re still as popular as ever, and what’s happening in this historical subgenre that’s new and fresh.
Is harsh history romantic? Elise has graciously agreed to share some ideas about medievals – the chivalry, the history, and what makes a romance novel work in a setting where historical accuracy means a world with a challenging dominant belief system characterized by religious intolerance, a rigid feudal class system, very limited access to literacy and learning for most people, and marriage laws that left women with very few rights, even over their own bodies and children.
Pamela: I just read a great review of Jeannie Lin’s THE JADE TEMPTRESS in which Miss Bates referred to the setting – also medieval, but 9th century China – as a “harsh, hierarchical world” (I can’t wait to read this one, too!). What makes this kind of setting a good place to tell a compelling love story?
Elise: It comes down to stakes. In the medieval period, regardless of which continent we’re talking about, the “harsh, hierarchical world” often meant most people were so focused on their survival and that of their family, the concept of “love” we think of today was rare as a result. The medieval version of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs often didn’t move beyond food and shelter for the vast majority of people living at the time. So when love did strike, the afflicted had a lot of barriers to work through. Not least of which was the concept of marriage, which was essentially a contract negotiated between families at the behest of their liege lord. Compatibility had more to do with dowries, ready coin, and the whims of nobility instead of attraction, passion, fidelity. So love not only had to exist, it had to be a love worth fighting for, since often the couple would be going against the wishes of their families and their liege lord, removing any security they had in society. It was a harsh world indeed for lovers of the time.
Pamela: What do you think is the particular appeal of the European-set medieval? Are there deeper associations with folklore and fairytales many English-speaking readers may have grown up with?
Elise: For me, the medieval time period comes closest to evoking the world of fairytales. Castles, knights, adventures, with the more unpleasant aspects blunted by the passage of time. I grew up on fairytales—the Brothers Grimm, Hans Christian Andersen, Andrew Lang. This legacy is distinctly Europe-centric, so it makes sense to me that many historical romance authors keep returning to European history and the fairytale structure with the obligatory happily-ever-after in the stories we write for ourselves and others. (I wonder to what extent that would change had I been exposed to the fairy tales and myths from other cultures at such a formative age.)
Pamela: I kept thinking about your siege metaphor as I was reading about the Crusaders’ trebuchets and other siege implements and strategies, in Penman’s LIONHEART. That was a later period than SIEGE OF THE HEART, which is set immediately following the Norman Conquest, but the forced marriage as part of a strategy of conquest, alliance, and/or assimilation is a common theme. It’s a tried and true historical romance trope, but I think it can be particularly powerful in a medieval story – how does it work in medieval to become more, and to transcend the plot device that serves to throw the hero and heroine together?
Elise: The forced marriage trope is indeed common in historical romance. The reason I think it works in medievals is because the marriage is bigger than either partner, and more is riding on its success. Servants, townspeople, villeins, and vassals all had a stake in the success or failure of an alliance. The term “peace weaver” originates from the Anglo-Saxons where a woman was married off to a warring tribe to make peace (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace-weaver). To have so much riding on a match raises the stakes for a relationship, and finding ways for the hero and heroine to connect, compromise, and complement each other are elements at the heart of any romance, regardless of the time period.
Pamela: Isabel faces a forced marriage like so many widowed or otherwise vulnerable women of the ruling class in her period, because a single woman can’t “hold” a castle, or a kingdom, for her liege lord, and needs to be married to another powerful lord. But in what ways does she hold power? Can she hold on to her own inner “castle” – ie. her heart, at least until she chooses to open the gates…?
Elise: When I chose to write in this time period, I soon realized the cards would be stacked against my heroine Isabel. The fallout from the Norman Conquest threw so many lives in turmoil, including that of an unwed English noblewoman. So I had to figure out a way to not only make her someone worthy of a story, but also have enough agency to sustain one. That way a modern reader could respect her choices despite changes in culture and gender roles brought on by the march of time. It helps that my heroine is a bit spoiled by her father, still mourning the loss of his wife. Because of this, Isabel has been afforded opportunities to acquire certain skills and experiences not available to other women. Her power lies in the respect she commands from her father’s men and the rest of the household, her knowledge of the land and the vassals who tend it, and the passion she brings to her responsibilities. The result, I hope, is a strong character, cognizant of her place in the world, confident in her abilities, who realizes her heart is only hers to give.
Pamela: Beyond her inner qualities and skills such as strength of purpose or being politically astute, you also gave Isabel an outwardly fighting spirit and weaponry and badassery to go with it. She’s quite a shield-maiden, and in this way reminds me of the warrior maidens from a Tolkien saga, or the early Norse mythologies that inspired him. What made you decide to have Isabel be skilled at physical combat in her own right, in spite of needing to marry in order to retain dominion over her family’s lands?
Elise: Well, badassery was indeed a consideration. One thing I always disliked about fairy tales was the passive or secondary role women often played. I didn’t want that for my heroine, especially given the modern lens and the power dynamics of the time. So I wanted her skills with blade and bow to match her fighting spirit. She couldn’t be easily dismissed, politically, personally, physically. If you dig into the accounts of the Conquest, it wasn’t very pretty. I wanted a heroine who could transcend the brutality of the time period and be strong enough to pick up the pieces afterward.
Pamela: Alex is a wonderfully patient yet determined siege strategist. It’s refreshing to read a medieval warrior hero who’s open about his willingness to fall in love with the heiress he’s being commanded to marry, rather than bemoan his lost bachelorhood or succumbing to insta-lust for wedding, bedding, and then ignoring his new bride. He approaches Isabel as he would any worthy potential adversary or ally – and only once he realizes that he’s attracted to her, both physically and in terms of her character, does he decide upon a courtship strategy of emotional siege warfare. So many romance novels cast the hero as the protagonist whose deeper emotions are walled up behind a mental fortress – did you think about this as an inversion or subversion?
Elise: I did try to invert some expectations when it came to Alex, the Norman knight who throws Isabel’s world in turmoil. Going back to the brutality of the Conquest, it’s easy to assume that bloodlust is what defined the conquerors as they raped, pillaged, and razed the land on their trek from the coast to the heart of London. I felt not every man William brought to England could be ruled by such aggression—these very knights were the origins of chivalry after all, formalized roughly a hundred years later. As a conqueror, it’s easy to view Alex as a “bad guy.” So I tried to give Alex those honorable, chivalric impulses, while retaining the rough edges of the Norman culture. Having him in touch with his emotions, aware of how he’s perceived by others and how to manipulate that, were tools I used to keep him accessible to the reader. I also wanted to highlight his leadership qualities—he may be a landless knight, seeking his fortune in England, but he is still worthy of a noblewoman like Isabel.
Pamela: They do seem very well-matched, and I am looking forward to finishing their story.
I am also feeling very pleased with myself for rediscovering the delights of a well-crafted medieval romance. It’s interesting there are some very popular mainstream television series with medieval or medieval-inspired settings, and I have been wondering if we’d start seeing more romance novels that show the influence of Game of Thrones or Vikings, at least in terms of setting, if not theme, but perhaps there is more epic fantasy that uses such settings these days, as opposed to traditional histrom? I’ve gone back to find Jo Beverley’s medievals – new to me and, as expected, both satisfying and and complex — but I’m also eager for recommendations of newer titles. Apart from the perennial popularity of Scottish-theme books (which tend to involve castles and claymores, even when set in a later century!), I’m having a hard time coming up with recent traditional medieval romances. (Happily, Elise is working to fill the void.)
From the publisher, about SIEGE OF THE HEART: He fought for king and country, but that battle was nothing compared to the one he’ll wage for a woman’s heart.
Still reeling from the news of her father’s death during the Norman Conquest, Isabel Dumont is unprepared when trouble arrives at the castle gates. Alexandre d’Évreux, a Norman knight with close ties to England’s new king, has arrived to secure the land and the loyalties of the Dumont family. Desperate to protect her people, Isabel strives to keep the confounding knight at arm’s length and hide the truth about her father’s death.
For Alexandre, the spoils of war come with more than just a generous gift of land. They come with Isabel Dumont. Vowing to marry only for love, Alexandre finds himself in a difficult situation as a conqueror granted dominion over the land and its people. Isabel is the one person capable of helping him win the regard of those living in the war-torn country…if he chooses to accept her.
Just when Alexandre finds a spark of hope that he and Isabel have a chance at love, she vanishes. His quest to find her plunges him deeper into the conquest’s fallout. Was she taken? Or did she leave?
CONTENT WARNING: Entering into this novel may cause extreme affection toward knights of old, admiration for strong-willed women, and the overwhelming belief that love really can conquer all.
SIEGE OF THE HEART is available from Kensington as an e-book in the usual places. I believe a print edition is forthcoming. I’m grateful to the publisher and to Elise for sharing an e-ARC with me.
Harlequin/Mills & Boon still publish medievals every so often. Blythe Gifford and Carol Townend come to mind and Michelle Styles and Michelle Willingham have been writing Vikings.
Thank you! I am especially interested in some new Vikings… I’m curious about the ‘other-ing’ that goes on in these, especially when it involves cultural differences laden with the “savage” label. I loved your post on Native American histrom.
Thanks! I’m not sure about the current crop of HM&B Vikings since I haven’t read them, but you mentioned Scottish-set medievals in your post and I’ve read some which (a) felt like they were set in an alternative, fantasy universe and (b) treated Highlanders as sexy savages. It didn’t exactly encourage me to look for more.
Sometimes it’s interesting when the book itself tries to deconstruct the sexy savage Highlander, but I agree that many/most seem to just replicate the cliche(s).
Thank you for Miss Bates’ review reference. I absolutely loved Lin’s JADE TEMPTRESS to pieces. I also find the European Medieval period, also the Byzantine Empire ;-), very compelling settings. I look forward to reading Elise’s book and equally so to hear your thoughts about 9th century China, one temptress, and her constable-lover.
Carol Townend’s novels for HM&B include a trilogy “set in eleventh century Byzantium.” I have no idea whether or not you’d love them, though.
Thank you for the suggestion nevertheless! Eleventh century was before Crusaders devastated Constantinople, so things should be looking up in them at least …
That was a great review! I am looking forward to the Lin book immensely.
I’d love to read/hear your response to it! 🙂
Oh hooray! A medieval romance–I’ll be on the lookout, because it sounds good and I’m a sucker for a good medieval romance.
Current medievals are thin on the ground, but there are oodles of excellent oldies:
The great Roberta Gellis wrote a ton of medieval set novels, the Roselynd books being the best known. Strong women–check! Equally strong men–check! Lots of politics–check! Lots of action–check! Lots and lots of romance–check and check!
My favorite conquest-era story is a really old YA title–Heart’s Conquest by Gladys Malvern. And, of course, there’s always “Ivanhoe”!
Juliet Marillier did a trilogy set in early 500s(?)Scotland–The Bridei Chronicles (‘Dark Mirror’ is the first). These books have some fantasy elements, but the historical setting rings true.
And, of course, Laura Kinsale wrote the fantastic ‘For My Lady’s Heart’. Sigh…
Thanks so much for these great recommendations! A good friend has been suggesting Juliet Marillier to me for years…so I must certainly look at these. I agree about Roberta Gellis, and I’m also about halfway through Jo Beverley’s THE SHATTERED ROSE which is an unusual look at a challenging medieval marriage (marriage as alliance, absent Crusader husband thought to be dead, adulterous heroine, violent hero…).
20 years later, I’m still a *huge* fan of Penman’s Welsh trilogy. I’ve read at least 2 copies of Here Be Dragons to shreds in my time. Great, great medieval series.
Margaret Mallory’s All the King’s Men series is a great medieval romance trilogy. I remember being reminded when I first read Knight of Pleasure how much I’d missed good, rich complex medievals among the Regency craze.
I don’t think I’ve seen the Margaret Mallory trilogy – thanks so much for the recommendation! I absolutely agree about Here Be Dragons – I also have two copies. 🙂 Have you been keeping up with her, and reading the recent books? Do you like them as much? It really is hard to believe the Welsh books were 20 years ago. I think this realization is making me feel suddenly old even more than my college reunion or seeing kids and their friends in “retro” ’80s styles…
Merline Lovelace wrote a book set in the Kingdom of Outremer during the 12th century. It’s “Crusader Captive” a Harlequin Historical. I read it awhile ago and memory says it’s a solid C+ read.
Also I just read a thinkpiece by Katherine Addison at Fantasy Cafe http://www.fantasybookcafe.com/ that sort of ties into your discussion. She is ruminating about Tolkien’s women (not that there are many women at all) but especially about Eowyn.
Thanks so much for the rec – I love that title in spite of myself.
I am so happy to have the link to the piece about Tolkien! Just finished watching the 3 Lord of the Rings films with my daughters, and we talked a lot about Eowyn and the ‘shield maiden’ archetype. I don’t read much/enough fantasy but I wonder if that is where the momentum for medieval imagery is, rather than un-magical historicals.
It’s an inversion cos hero is the captive and heroine is captor. I read it because I have such fond memories of books like Knight’s Fee by Ronald Welch read when I was a young teen
Thanks again, Pamela, for having me at Badass Romance! I read a bunch of Harlequin medievals growing up. Laurie Grant’s Lord Liar was one of the stand outs. I’ve enjoyed Penman as well–love the scope of her stories and how she shows people from different social strata as well. I haven’t delved to deeply into medieval fantasy, but I’m intrigued by the recs here. Happy reading!
Reblogged this on Elise Cyr and commented:
Pamela of Badass Romance was kind enough to host me on her site where we talk medieval times, romance, and siege warfare. Check it out!
Reblogged this on the passionate reader.
[…] before I started hitting the panels. Lunch, I spent with the wonderful Pamela of Badass Romance. She hosted me on her blog awhile back, and I’ve always found her posts to be insightful, in-depth examinations of the genre. Her post […]
[…] My dialogue with Pamela of Badass Romance on Siege Warfare: Meditations on Medieval Romance […]
[…] This is a killer interview by Badass Romance. […]